|
| |
Martin and Sue have recently finished an electric Fiesler
Storch, below are some notes about the build.
|
 |
|
The arrival of a somewhat
different model on the patch recently has caused some interest, not
least because of its unusual flying characteristics. The model in
question is a 2 metre span Fiesler Storch, very like a Piper Cub but
with more ‘dangly bits’.
The full size version, officially
known as the Fiesler Fi 156 Storch, is a two seat 1930s and WW2
observation / liaison aircraft with notable short take-off and landing
capabilities. Flying speed is from 30 mph to 125 mph. Power is
supplied by a single inverted air cooled V8 Argus engine delivering 240
HP. Some versions are now fitted with radial engines.
|
|
|
|
| There are several examples still flying, one at Duxford,
which posed for pictures to help the build. Others can be found on the
internet. One is currently being refurbished in the Shuttleworth Collection
workshops. So why build a Storch? It is makes a change from the ARTF
and specialist aerobatic models regularly seen, it provided an engineering
challenge so would not be boring to build, and it should be slow flying and
stable to suit my experience level. As the build followed that of ‘Skippin’ my
first electric trainer, it was not needed in a hurry as I had to learn to fly
first! I did consider a Lysander, but that seemed just a little too complicated
for only my second off-plan build in 30 years. The total job to date (currently
flight testing before completing the paint job and adding final details) has
taken some 18 months, but with several other models being given priority in the
build schedule.
|
|
The model originated as Traplet
plan MW2733, supported by an article in Electric Flight International
April 99. Span is 79 inches and weight came out at approximately 6 lb
including batteries. The model was originally designed for a geared 600
can motor and 8-10 NiMh cells. This was replaced with brushless motor
and 3S Li-pos. I was advised on motor type, speed controller,
batteries, prop etc by Johm Emms, Puffin models. Motor is a Mega
22/30/4 drawing 40 A at takeoff, speed controller is a Jeti Advance 40
Opto, battery a 3700 mAh 3S Li-Po, receiver is a Multiplex dual
conversion with IPD (intelligent pulse decoding). |
|
 |
|
The model is of conventional built-up
structure with an open frame fuselage using spruce longerons. Covering is
Solartex, which proved easy to use and looks the part for a fabric covered
original. Detail parts were transferred from the plan to balsa/ply sheets by
photocopying the plan, then cutting and pasting the images using Spraymount
spray glue. A word of caution here - not all photocopies copy at exactly 100%
of original size. Wing ribs were made as a block using ply templates.
One type of construction used, that I
hadn’t met before on models (common in full size), was the use of lamination for
curved surfaces such as fin, tailplane and elevator outlines. On this model
these comprised four laminations of alternate 0.4 mm (1/64”) ply and 1/16”
balsa. These were easily made by cutting the strips of ply and balsa, glueing
a copy of the plan to a flat wooden shelf, then drilling holes and sticking in
cocktail sticks around the inside of outline shape. The laminations were then
lightly sanded, coated with PVA glue and wrapped around the curve described by
the cocktail sticks. When dry the lamination was removed from the jig and
sanded to profile. The result is both light and strong and retains its shape
well. For tight curves, steam the wood first (I used a modified kitchen
steamer). Leading edge slats were laminated along 6 inch drain pipe to get the
correct curvature. |
|
 |
|
Another
innovation (for me) was the use of 0.4 mm (1/64”) ply as reinforcement
at stress points and in laminations - it is easily cut with kitchen
scissors, very strong and light - super stuff.
Flap and
aileron hinges were made up as per plan from 1.5 mm ply with brass
bushes. Carbon rods were used to stiffen u/c tubes and to mount the
removable tailplane.
Modifications
from the plan include stronger (laminated) slats, servos fully embedded
into the wings, a new flap drive method, a more realistic sprung
undercarriage and a spring biased castoring tail wheel. The open frame
ailerons and flaps warped when they were covered, so these had to be
fully skinned . |
|
Challenges? Not surprisingly, sorting
out the flap linkages and servos to give symmetrical operation at all settings
(pretty vital) and the undercarriage design and build.
What would I do differently? - Not use
elastic bands and hooks to hold the wings against the fuselage. Shear pins
would make rigging much easier. If I had known how slowly the model would fly,
I would have made the u/c stronger (heavier).
Results – On the first flight, with
flaps retracted, the model tracked perfectly straight across the ground and was
airborne very quickly. No trimming was needed to get it to fly straight – very
satisfying. Height is maintained with about half power, it flies slowly, is
stable but also is very manoeuvrable. The glide is surprisingly flat, given the
draggy nature of the design. Using flaps requires some down elevator to
maintain a comfortable flying speed, currently mixed in at 20%. The castoring
tail wheel allows scale type taxiing with the ability to turn on the spot by
putting on full rudder and blipping the throttle – just as full size.
What next? - Learn how to use an
airbrush and complete the detailing, now I know that it flies!
Next project – DH Dragon Rapide, Traplet
plan again, based on original at the museum by Hurn airport (well worth a
visit).
Advice for someone doing a build from a
plan - Plans have often been reviewed in one of the hobby magazines about their
time of issue. These reviews usually contain extra building information, best
sequences, explanations of complicated bits, pictures taken during the original
build. Very useful in deciphering plans which may contain contradictory
information or be difficult to understand.
Some plans can even have detail shapes
for complete formers missing.
Don’t expect plans to be more than
semi-scale, unless claimed otherwise by the author. Photos of a full size
example often show up quite large differences between the shape on the plan and
the shape of the original. Be wary of altering wing or tailplane shapes, but
fuselage cross sections, nacelle shapes etc can often be improved.
Useful sites - www.leespring.com
contains tutorial on springs and how to specify them, they also supply springs
of all types. Good for that sprung undercarriage. Sources of bits –
Cubitts Models in Trowbridge.
Martin & Sue H , Nov 2007
|
|